CraterView, Topaz Labs and Clarity AI compared
Twelve photographs enlarged four times by CraterView, Topaz Labs and Clarity AI, six at high ISO denoised by CraterView and Topaz Labs, the same region side by side, and what each costs.
We enlarged real photographs with four models: CraterView Enhance, Topaz Labs Standard V2 and Wonder 3.5, and Clarity AI Crystal. Topaz Labs and Clarity AI are both industry-leading software solutions focused on AI-powered image and video enhancement. What each tool was given is the photograph as it was taken or posted, so there is no sharper original to score against, and the comparison is the one that matters to you: what each result looks like. Further down, six photographs taken at ISO 12800 and 25600 go through CraterView Denoise and two of Topaz Labs’ denoise models, at their own size; Clarity AI offers no denoiser.
cv-enhance-v3. WIPE, ZOOM & PAN to see more detail. Photograph by Ashley Dace, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.How to read the figures
Each figure is one small region of one photograph, as each tool returned it, never resized:
- The photograph, its own pixels each drawn four times, so you can see what the tools had to work with.
- Lanczos upscale: a standard resize, the kind any image editor does. Lanczos is the method: it makes the photograph four times bigger by smoothing between its pixels, and adds nothing. It shows what the photograph holds and nothing more.
- Topaz Labs Standard V2, Topaz Labs’ default upscaler.
- Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5, Topaz Labs’ newest model for generating detail.
- Clarity AI Crystal, Clarity AI’s precision upscaler.
- CraterView Enhance,
cv-enhance-v3.
Every tool ran with its own default settings.
Text and maps
The photograph
Lanczos upscale
Topaz Labs Standard V2
Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5
Clarity AI Crystal
CraterView EnhanceThe legend of a trail map at Lynn Canyon Park. The photograph holds the words, just: the Lanczos upscale can be read with some effort. Enhance writes them as they are, Approximate times from the Ecology Centre (one way). Wonder and Crystal draw letters just as sharp but misread several words: Appcoimate, Foology Centre, 30 Foot Foot. Topaz Labs Standard V2 sharpens the blur into shapes that are not letters.
Where the print is smaller than the photograph can hold, no tool can read it. On the same board, the road names beside the legend come back invented from all four, Enhance included. A sharp word is not evidence that it was there to be read.
The photograph
Lanczos upscale
Topaz Labs Standard V2
Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5
Clarity AI Crystal
CraterView EnhanceA paragraph on the Beccles board above. Here Enhance and Wonder are both crisp and both spelt correctly; Crystal is readable but softer; Standard V2 misshapes the letters. Photograph by Ashley Dace, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
The photograph
Lanczos upscale
Topaz Labs Standard V2
Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5
Clarity AI Crystal
CraterView EnhanceA hand-drawn village map at Harpham. Lines and shapes are easier than letters: Wonder, Crystal and Enhance are close to each other here, and Standard V2 leaves pale halos along the lines. Photograph by Ian S, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Hair and fur
The photograph
Lanczos upscale
Topaz Labs Standard V2
Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5
Clarity AI Crystal
CraterView EnhanceZoom into the fur. Wonder and Crystal draw more strands, and sharper ones, but many are short, even strokes laid across the locks rather than along them. Enhance’s strands are softer, and follow the way each lock falls: they look like fur in a photograph. Standard V2 sharpens hard. Photograph by Megs Harrison on Unsplash.
The photograph
Lanczos upscale
Topaz Labs Standard V2
Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5
Clarity AI Crystal
CraterView EnhanceA wolf in black and white, and the same difference. Wonder and Crystal cover the coat in short hatched strokes, much alike everywhere, Crystal’s the coarsest. Enhance’s fur follows the shape of the face and the coat. All three draw the eyes clearly; Standard V2 turns the photograph’s grain into speckle.
The photograph
Lanczos upscale
Topaz Labs Standard V2
Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5
Clarity AI Crystal
CraterView EnhanceThis photograph already has dark outlines around the hair and the pack, from sharpening done before we had it: you can see them in the photograph itself. Wonder and Enhance clean them away and draw the pack’s zips and logo, and Enhance’s loose hair keeps the direction the wind is blowing it; Crystal keeps the outlines. Photograph by Toomas Tartes on Unsplash.
Rock, the Moon and Mars
The photograph
Lanczos upscale
Topaz Labs Standard V2
Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5
Clarity AI Crystal
CraterView EnhanceA layered cliff above Lake Agnes in the Canadian Rockies. Wonder and Crystal draw crisp layers and cracks; Enhance follows the same layers, more softly. Photograph by Garythai, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
The photograph
Lanczos upscale
Topaz Labs Standard V2
Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5
Clarity AI Crystal
CraterView EnhanceA rock on Mars, with the small blue-grey spheres the Opportunity rover found there. Wonder covers the whole rock in crinkled texture that the photograph gives no sign of. Crystal stays close to the Lanczos upscale. Enhance adds some grain and fine layering, less than Wonder, and keeps the spheres round. Photograph by NASA/JPL/Cornell.
The photograph
Lanczos upscale
Topaz Labs Standard V2
Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5
Clarity AI Crystal
CraterView EnhanceThe colour calibration target on the Perseverance rover’s deck. Wonder, Crystal and Enhance draw clean rings and edges; Standard V2 turns the small dark marks into noise. Photograph by NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASU/MSSS/NBI-UCPH.
The photograph
Lanczos upscale
Topaz Labs Standard V2
Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5
Clarity AI Crystal
CraterView EnhanceA full moon rising. All six are close: the photograph holds little of the Moon’s markings, and no tool finds more. Wonder mottles the surface slightly. Photograph by Astro Backyard.
Lettering and small figures
The photograph
Lanczos upscale
Topaz Labs Standard V2
Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5
Clarity AI Crystal
CraterView EnhanceThe word on the space station’s robotic arm. Wonder, Crystal and Enhance all write it cleanly; Standard V2 breaks the letters. Photograph by NASA.
The photograph
Lanczos upscale
Topaz Labs Standard V2
Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5
Clarity AI Crystal
CraterView EnhanceA hiker crossing snow on the Plain of Six Glaciers trail, a few dozen pixels tall, with a bright outline already in the photograph. Crystal makes the outline heavier and smears the figure; Wonder is clean but keeps the outline; Enhance drops most of the outline but is softer, and turns a dark shape at the hiker’s side into something hanging from a strap, which the photograph cannot confirm. Photograph by David Wilson, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Noise at high ISO
Six photographs taken at ISO 12800 and 25600, each a window of about a megapixel at the original’s own pixels, through three denoisers:
- CraterView Denoise,
cv-denoise-v1, which redraws the picture without its grain. - Topaz Labs Denoise Extreme, Topaz Labs’ model for heavy noise at very high ISO.
- Topaz Labs Denoise Max, Topaz Labs’ generative denoiser.
Clarity AI offers no denoiser. Each tool ran with its own defaults, and every result came back at the photograph’s own size. Each figure shows the same region of the photograph and of each result, each pixel drawn twice.
The photograph
CraterView Denoise
Topaz Labs Denoise Extreme
Topaz Labs Denoise MaxPrice tags at a fruit market in Funchal, written by hand and stamped. CraterView Denoise and Denoise Extreme clear the grain and keep every letter. Denoise Max rewrites the stamped words: P.V.P. comes back as P.ICP., and KILO as MELKS. Photograph by Dietmar Rabich, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
The photograph
CraterView Denoise
Topaz Labs Denoise Extreme
Topaz Labs Denoise MaxA guest at a wedding reception. All three clear the grain from her face. Denoise Extreme and Denoise Max keep her skin and colour as the photograph has them; CraterView Denoise draws darker lashes and smoother skin, a little cooler in colour. Photograph by John Trainor, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
The photograph
CraterView Denoise
Topaz Labs Denoise Extreme
Topaz Labs Denoise MaxA lion in the bush in the last light. Denoise Extreme smooths the fur into a painted look; Denoise Max keeps it natural and close to the photograph; CraterView Denoise draws the most hairs, more than the photograph shows, and warms the coat. Photograph by Dietmar Rabich, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
The photograph
CraterView Denoise
Topaz Labs Denoise Extreme
Topaz Labs Denoise MaxA carved figure on the arch of the Striezelmarkt in Dresden. Denoise Extreme is clean but soft. CraterView Denoise and Denoise Max are crisp, and Max gives the figure a face, two eyes and a mouth, that the photograph does not show. Photograph by Dietmar Rabich, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
The photograph
CraterView Denoise
Topaz Labs Denoise Extreme
Topaz Labs Denoise MaxThe organ in St Stephen’s Cathedral, Vienna. Both Topaz Labs models clear the grain and keep the black keys black. CraterView Denoise lightens their shaded sides to a matte brown: across this window it is about 30 levels brighter on average than the photograph. Photograph by Dietmar Rabich, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
The photograph
CraterView Denoise
Topaz Labs Denoise Extreme
Topaz Labs Denoise MaxA singer on a red-lit stage in Dülmen. Both Topaz Labs models keep the red haze of the stage lights. CraterView Denoise takes the haze out with the grain: the background goes nearly black, his hair darkens, and his face comes back crisp but lit as it was not. Photograph by Dietmar Rabich, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
CraterView Denoise draws the cleanest detail and keeps lettering as it was written, but it does not always keep the light: in dark areas and strongly coloured light it can change the tone of the whole picture. Topaz Labs’ two models kept the tone of every photograph here to within a couple of levels.
Where each one stands
- CraterView Enhance keeps closest to what the photograph holds. It reads text best where the text is there to be read, keeps maps and lettering clean, and draws hair and fur the way they lie in the photograph.
- Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5 draws the most fine detail of the four. On rock it is often convincing; on hair and fur it is short, even strokes that do not always follow the coat. It also draws texture that is not in the photograph, and misreads small words.
- Clarity AI Crystal is detailed and the fastest. It keeps outlines and halos already in the photograph, and makes some heavier, and like Wonder it misreads small words.
- Topaz Labs Standard V2 sharpens what is there. It leaves halos and turns small lettering into shapes that are not letters.
For noise:
- CraterView Denoise draws the cleanest, crispest detail and keeps lettering as written. It also draws detail the photograph does not hold, and can change the light: it lightened dark surfaces and took the coloured haze out of a stage.
- Topaz Labs Denoise Max keeps the tone and natural texture, and rewrites small print and draws faces where the photograph has none.
- Topaz Labs Denoise Extreme keeps the tone and the lettering, and smooths fine texture.
Price
All of them charge per image, and some more for a larger result. Every size here is the result’s, not the photograph’s. These are the list prices on 10 October 2026, and on 21 October for the denoisers; the enlargements here were from 1 to 17 megapixels, about 6 for most, and the denoised windows about 1.
| Price per image | |
|---|---|
| CraterView Enhance | 1 credit, up to 170 megapixels (prices); free on the community queue, up to 13 |
| Topaz Labs Standard V2 | 1 credit, up to 24 megapixels; $0.08–0.12 a credit |
| Topaz Labs Wonder 3.5 | 1 credit up to 8 megapixels, 2 up to 16, 3 up to 24; $0.08–0.12 a credit |
| Clarity AI Crystal | $0.05 up to about 4.4 megapixels, $0.10 up to 8.6, $0.20 up to 17 |
| CraterView Denoise | 1 credit, up to about 1 megapixel at its own pixels or 10.6 tiled (prices); free on the community queue, up to 8.4 tiled |
| Topaz Labs Denoise Extreme | 1 credit up to 24 megapixels, 2 up to 40, 3 up to 64; $0.08–0.12 a credit |
| Topaz Labs Denoise Max | 1 credit up to 16 megapixels, 2 up to 40, 3 up to 50; $0.08–0.12 a credit |
How the comparison was made
- Real photographs only, of many kinds: people, pets and wildlife, landscapes, maps and text, and the Moon and Mars. Each was sent at the size it was found. Ten of the twelve here were sent whole; the Mars target and the Six Glaciers hiker come from larger originals, and the tools were sent a 768 × 576 window of each at the original’s own pixel size.
- Four times, each tool’s defaults. Only the model, the enlargement and the output format were set. Every result came back at exactly four times the photograph’s size, as PNG, so none was compressed on the way back.
- Run on 9 and 10 October 2026 through each service’s public API.
- Six high-ISO photographs for the denoisers, each sent as a 1152 × 864 window at the original’s own pixels: about a megapixel, as much as CraterView Denoise works at its own pixels without tiling. Only the model and the output format were set, and every result came back at the window’s own size, as PNG. Topaz Labs’ ran through its public API on 21 October 2026; CraterView Denoise ran the same day on the code the service runs, before it was offered through the API.
Try it on your own file
No signup and no card — a workspace opens for your browser the moment you do.
Open Web App